Platformisation of the Financial Sector


We are on the eve of a landslide in the financial sector. In the next few years, the prevailing structure of the industry will be challenged by a new infrastructural and economic model that is dominated by platforms, a trend known as platformisation.[1]

This trend is the impetus of the My Financial Data-project recently initiated by the Sustainable Finance Lab.[2] We will investigate the possibilities and deterrents of setting up a platform for financial data.

In this series of blogs we will consider platformisation and its implications for the financial sector and for society as a whole. This first blog discusses the current role of the platform economy in the financial sector and the transformation it can bring. The role of incumbent players is set against the new kids on the block: BigTech and FinTech.[3] Developments in the sector raise important questions about privacy, data security, regulation, stability and competition, amongst others, which provide the fuel for the upcoming blogs in this series.

Lees verder →

Max van Son


WE PRESENT TO YOU: THE CIRCULAR SERVICE PLATFORM


A TECHNICAL-ADMINISTRATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR MANAGING VALUE IN CIRCULAR NETWORKS

This Community of Practice (COP) — an interdisciplinary open learning space — was different from all other projects I have been doing so far. We didn’t study a specific circular problem this time, but we studied a solution: a platform for circular business networks with the aim to grow the circular economy. This may sound easy, it was far from easy!

In a circular economy, assets are no longer sold. Rather, assets are collectively serviced by circular service (CISE) networks, comprising all stakeholders involved in keeping an asset functioning. This requires unprecedented levels of cooperation and coordination, with high administrative costs and the need for trust and transparency in the network. Redesigning business processes towards cooperation and transparency diametrically opposes the business logic we are used to.

Cooperation and transparency diametrically oppose the business logic we are used to

We found out that the use of distributed ledger technology (DLT) could be useful for our desired outcome of coordinating transactions, the provenance of assets throughout their lifecycle, automatic execution of payments and providing trust in the network. However, (1) if there is no wish for providing services (e.g. repair, upgrades) directly on the asset (rather via an intermediary ) or (2) there is no need for handling many micropayments to be distributed over a network of participants, conventional database technologies might apply.

The starting point of our COP was a Proof-of-Concept (POC) developed by Rabobank, that fully automates the payment administration of assets that are offered in a pay-per-use proposition, such as cars (pay per km driven), and milk robots (pay per litre of milk). This seemed to fit our pilot case study of Bundles very well. Bundles is a circular company that provides its customers with the service of ‘clean laundry’, by providing them a durable washing machine and charging them per washing cycle. Bundles is in need for new financial structures and administrative tools to grow its business.

In addition to its basic functionality of automatically charging end-users for using an asset (e.g. per washing cycle), the COP introduced several other features:

  1. The automatic distribution of the paid use fees to network participants to compensate for servicing the asset. This enables service providers to engage with the assets, without a central party to coordinate;
  2. A transparent ledger containing information regarding revenues that are generated by a specific asset. This enables a clear division of rights and obligations regarding collateral and cashflows;
  3. Micropayments (smaller then €0,01) against low cost. This makes high volumes of transactions with small amounts affordable;
  4. Accessibility for anyone contributing to a circular economy, stimulating circular competition and lower prices;
  5. Community-ownership and maintenance by the CISE network participants. This allows the proceeds to be distributed amongst the CISE network rather than creating rents for the platform;
  6. The ability for all network participants, including end-users, to co-finance assets or innovations. Repayments are based on generated use fees, leading to new types of circular financial products;
  7. A governance structure of the platform in the so-called code of conduct. This covers rules governing: (a) the eligibility of access to the platform, (b) the rights and obligations regarding the management of the platform (and corresponding legal entity), (c) decision-making processes, and (d) constitutional arrangements.

The technical infrastructure we developed is meant for scaling circular initiatives. Commercial benefits should therefore not come from the maintenance of the infrastructure but from the circular business activity that is facilitated by it. It is therefore essential that the CISE Platform is open-source, not-for-profit and community-maintained.

However, a private, permissioned, DLT system was chosen, to fit the experimental phase we are in. Although the platform inherently places incentives for circularity, minimal eligibility criteria needed to be introduced to ensure the circular character of the platform. Also, sub-optimal design choices were necessary to ensure privacy. A roadmap will be developed to work towards an optimal architecture. For the interested reader, choices regarding technical design configurations can be found in the white paper.

A general problem with these types of projects is that they come with high implementation and maintenance costs. Moreover, viability of the project is still uncertain. Additionally, expert knowledge on software architecture is needed to be able to assess the related development risks.

We do believe, however, that such a platform could be transformational to the circular economy, enabling CISE networks in a wide array of sectors. To realize this potential requires tremendous effort, dedication and cooperation. We have taken the first steps, but a long path still lies ahead. The support of many is crucial to its success. We invite anyone that is interested in being part of the circular economy to join our network and engage with us in future developments.

Further reading:

Would like to join or want more information, contact Elisa Achterberg at e.achterberg@uu.nl.

Elisa Achterberg


Central banks ignore climate risks at their peril


A shortened version of this letter was published on the website of the Financial Times.

In the article ‘Sustainable finance: central banks test water on climate risk’ (December 6) Mr Paul Fisher argues that “governments could add climate goals to central banks remits as a secondary objective”. It is important to notice that this has already been done for the European Central Bank (ECB) as the EU Treaty states: “Without prejudice to the objective of price stability, the ESCB shall support the general economic policies” (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) 2012, Article 127(1)).
According to Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) these include “sustainable development” and “a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment.” Since the Paris Accord, signed by both the EU and all of its member states, it is undisputed that combating climate change is a priority in these fields.

Lees verder →

Rens van Tilburg


Climate finance: regulation, big business or collaborative action?


If you put five hundred actors from the financial sector in a French palace for three days, will this solve the climate financing gap? I recently spent three days in the Palais Brongniart at the Climate Finance conference to find out. I found three strategies that the financial industry are using to try to upscale climate (and SDG) finance: regulate, find the business case and ‘we have to do it together’.

Lees verder →

Helen Toxopeus


Fintech and the promise of sustainability


Fintech and sustainability are the two major drivers of change in the financial sector. There isn’t a financial institution that’s not involved in it. There isn’t a startup that does not derive its right to exist from it. What is striking about this, however, is that the combination is rare. Fintech is usually primarily a way of organising the existing financial practice more efficiently. But what is the role of fintech in creating a financial sector that includes green and social values?

In 2016, the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) published a report called Fintech and Sustainable Development. The report presents sustainable development and new (financial) technology as the two ‘strains’ of DNA. They both have the same ‘basic potential as drivers of change and impact’ and are suitable for ‘creating new, sustainable business models’.

Lees verder →


Commonizing our future


Last Tuesday, the knights of the future assembled in the Hall of Knights in The Hague, to co-create, connect and #commonize our future. Inspiring talks were alternated with interdisciplinary working sessions to come up with challenges to address big societal problems using technology (such as Blockchain).

What makes this technological revolution so valuable to me is that it triggers us to fundamentally re-think our current system and our underlying values.

Lees verder →

Elisa Achterberg