Last month Sustainable Finance Lab and the New Economics Foundation organised a virtual roundtable discussion on climate risk and prudential supervision. The goal of the discussion was to identify next steps in supervising these risks in the banking sector. Representatives from multiple central banks, academics and NGOs were present at the roundtable and shared their ideas.Lees verder →
The current global climate finance agenda is insufficient to limit climate change. Especially expectations regarding the role that blended finance and domestic resource mobilization can play seem wildly optimistic.Lees verder →
We need a publicly anchored safe payment and savings system, not depending on the commercial banks that need to provide risky credit to companies, argue professors Dirk Bezemer (Groningen University), Arnoud Boot (Amsterdam University) and Mark Sanders (Maastricht University), all members of the Sustainable Finance Lab.Lees verder →
The Network for the Greening of the Financial Sector (NGFS), the ‘green club’ of central banks, has recently published the latest version of its climate scenarios. These are intended to be used in the financial sector to model the impact of climate change, as well as mitigation efforts to limit its worst effects. However, at the current state of these scenarios, there is a real danger that they give financial institutions a false sense of comfort, leading to too little climate mitigation action. At the Sustainable Finance Lab, we recently responded to the NGFS’ call for feedback on the last vintage of the scenarios. This blog summarizes our feedback and suggestions for improvements.Lees verder →
Last weekend a right-wing coalition led by former fascist Giorgia Meloni won the elections in Italy. Europe braces nervously for yet another problem in what already is a complicated time. Will a new Meloni government continue to live up to the economic reform promises made by its predecessor Draghi? Or will it risk losing the much needed 200 billion Euro of recovery funds from the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility set up in response to the covid crisis?Lees verder →
After three years, the Sustainable Finance Lab (SFL) concluded its the Energy Transition climate related risks to the financial sector project. The project was coordinated by SFL with stakeholders from both academia and the financial sector: Utrecht University (Pathways to Sustainability hubs and REBO faculty), ABP/APG, Actiam, ING Bank, Rabobank, and the Dutch National Bank (DNB).
Within the framework of the project two versions of the General Equilibrium Model for Sustainable Transitions (GEMST) model were developed. The main contribution of GEMST models to their CGE counterparts is the distinction between green and brown final sub-sectors which allows for capturing both transition risk and opportunities. Moreover, the models envisioned a sector-specific capital stocks, which permits the allocation of new investments based on a sector-specific return/cost of capital. GEMST-1 is a one region model with 6 final sectors and 7 power sectors with a focus on energy related feedback loops between sectors. GEMST-2 is a model with three regions and trade channels between in intermediate and final goods between them, along with 13 final sectors and 7 power sectors in each region. Compared to GEMST-1, GEMST-2 has more detailed production structure capturing the intersectoral dependencies and feedback loops. These models can be used to analyze different market, policy or technological shocks on the transition towards a low carbon economy.
Moreover, project members Moutaz Altaghlibi and Rens van Tilburg were awarded a grant from the International Network for Sustainable Financial Policy Insights, Research and Exchange (INSPIRE) to investigate the impacts of green monetary and supervisory policy scenarios on the energy transition. This task resulted in a report titled: “HOW MUCH OF A HELP IS A GREEN CENTRAL BANKER? Quantifying the impact of green monetary and supervisory policies on the energy transition”. The report was written by Moutaz Altaghlibi, Rens van Tilburg and Mark Sanders. Key messages are:
- Central bank green intervention can substantially accelerate the transition with a climate contribution that amount to 5%-12% of the needed emission reductions.
- The maximum quantitative impact of the intervention is achieved when it targets both green final sub-sectors and renewable power sectors at the same time.
- An intervention that targets renewable sectors only induces spillover effects that could hinder the transition for most final sectors. => Coordination between central bank green intervention and other fiscal climate policies is essential for a timely and cost-effective transition.
- Central banks can play a substantial/significant role in the transition but it should be seen as complementary, supportive, to fiscal and regulatory efforts.
Furthermore, project leader Moutaz Altaghlibi participated in an analysis by the Dutch National Bank (DNB) on “The impact of carbon pricing and a CBAM on EU competitiveness”. This analysis was co-authored with Guido Schotten, Yannick Hemmerlé, Guus Brouwer, and Maurice Bun. Main results are:
- More effective carbon pricing can be implemented without significantly impairing competitiveness in the majority of sectors and countries.
- For the few carbon intensive sectors where production costs do increase significantly, a CBAM should be considered, in line with EC proposals.
- To reduce the threat of retaliation, it is critical to align the CBAM with WTO agreements.
- Temporary compensation measures, such as subsidies for emission reduction, can be considered to limit the negative effect of a carbon tax on certain carbon intensive exporters to non-EU countries.
Furthermore, within the framework of this project a working group of representatives of different stakeholder were formed. The group discussed different relevant transition drivers which then were analyzed using GEMST-1 model. The analysis titled: “General Equilibrium Impacts of Different Drivers of the Energy Transition” were written by Moutaz Altaghlibi. Key messages are:
- An increase in consumer willingness to switch between green and brown options would have a positive effect on the transition towards green sub-sectors.
- Higher efficiency improvements in energy usage by green sectors would induce a positive scale effect on overall output, associated with a temporary increase in emissions and a net positive effect on the transition.
- The effect of higher share of electrification in the production of one sector on the transition depends widely on the relative price levels of different energy sources in the benchmark scenario.
- Higher flexibility in the power infrastructure would have a positive impact on the transition of the electricity intensive Transportation sector, while hindering the transition in other final sectors mainly because of a feedback loop that affect the oil price negatively.
- A targeted sectoral green intervention by the central bank would have a positive effect on the transition in that sector with some negative feedback effects on the transition of other sectors. Moreover, if such intervention targets sectors that are not energy intensive, it may induce an increase in emissions.
In the follow up of this project, project members plan to use GEMST-2 to preform analyses on more international and sectoral based research questions linked to green monetary and supervisory policies, along with initiating new collaborations in this field between academic, policy and professional stakeholders.